Art Must Never Develop

Bullet thoughts on a broad topic:

  • Culture has a cyclical life, with birth, maturity, death, and rebirth.
  • “Golden Ages” typically happen during cultural maturity.
  • Separations of people into classes are strongest before cultural death.
  • Revolutions, or death/rebirth phases of culture, come about in response to class separation.
  • The democratic fight is on the side of the people taken as a whole.
  • The hegemonic fight is on the side of the ruling class.
  • A cultural “Golden Age” is defined as the time when developments in intellect are successfully disseminated across a large percentage of the populous.
  • The ruling class typically is responsible for this development and dissemination.
  • The majority of the populous is mediocre and lazy.
  • Crap. What a conclusion.
  • By this token, revolutions are mostly setbacks to cultural development.
  • Is art created during the death/rebirth of culture less developed than art created during cultural maturity?
  • It cannot be that Polykleitos’ Doryphoros is a higher work of art than De Kooning’s Woman I. The former is a distilled formula, the latter is a banner for a new world order.
  • Perhaps we must see art not as a higher form of the intellect to be grasped, but as an actor who is in constant need of new roles, and is never allowed to practice.
  • Art is the most talented person we know, who has a knack for meeting the moment. Our job is simply to challenge it with unprecedented moments.
  • Art must never develop.
  • We must be so much more urgent with art than we consider possible.
  • We must make the target move too fast to hit, then we must attempt to hit it.



Polykleitos, Doryphoros, 5th century BC. Image via
Willem de Kooning, Woman I, 1952. Image via

Power leisure

On my run this morning (PS: awesome views of a golden jersey shore, glinted highlights from parked barges, storage containers, and windows), I passed more dog walkers than runners. I then remembered an interesting point Carl Skelton made during my final fall semester thesis critique (round-table style) in 2009 as we delved into the many intangibles affecting the lives of public places, i.e. “the politics of public space.” He mentioned that a good indicator of if a person is a member of his local community board, voting on important decisions or not, is whether he/she owns a dog. Dogs are an obvious status symbol: as Charlotte said, you’re spending a ridiculous amount of money on something that does little more than eat and shit. But on a subtler level, you are forced into free time. Dogs are an accessory to leisure– and you have to set time aside to take it to the dog run and watch it socialize while you sit and watch– or, as apparently happens, chat with your fellow doglovers and come to executive decisions regarding that pothole on 96th street, the closure of that bodega on Columbus, or the next kids’ soccer tourney at Neville Colman Field.

RIP Neville Coleman

Those who ski or snowboard have probably sat next to older men discussing their stock portfolios, and, while I haven’t ever, I’m sure golfing is the same. They all include implicit periods of downtime– which are all but symbolic of your status in a stratum high enough in society that permits you, in discrete chunks of time, to do nothing at all.
During the industrial boom there were great outcries about workers’ conditions– it may have been the day’s juggernaut of political issues. Through the deliberations, a slogan appeared championing a new right of man. In addition to the right to freedom, happiness, etc, there was now a right to work (and it reached its pinnacle in granddaddy Roosevelt). Which, when you think about it, is monumental. Of course, once employment infiltrated the life of the middle class, the very opposite became important: a right to leisure. In the 60s, the Situationists postulated the new economic model wherein the life of the proletariat and the health of the economy is wholly dependent on that of leisure time, not around the time one spends working. It begs the nod to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs:

Culture is born out of leisure, and leisure is born out of the upper half of this pyramid (aside: it is noteworthy that Abraham Maslow intentionally studied society’s 1%, our dog-owners and skiing enthusiasts).

We can see one of the most naked displays of the power and luxury of leisure– and be reminded of how culture spawns– in our neighborhood dog runs.